Saturday, January 8, 2011

Wakefield and Peer Review

So the peer-reviewed literature people are trying to saw off the limb that used to hold up Andrew Wakefield. His most famous work is now described by the BMJ as a "deliberate fraud."

What about peer-reviewed medical literature in general? (See also here). What about peer-reviewed work in general, now that the boomers are in charge?

On Wakefield see also here.

No comments:

Post a Comment